IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jconrs/v48y2021i4p633-650..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building Brands for the Emerging Bicultural Market: The Appeal of Paradox Brands

Author

Listed:
  • Maria A Rodas
  • Deborah Roedder John
  • Carlos J Torelli
  • Margaret C Campbell
  • Stefano Puntoni

Abstract

Bicultural consumers now represent a third of the US population and are the fastest growing demographic group in the United States. This shift in consumer markets presents a challenge for marketers as they try to design brand strategies to serve this important group. In this article, the authors show that certain types of brands, specifically paradox brands that incorporate contradictory brand meanings, are particularly appealing to bicultural consumers. Results from seven studies reveal that bicultural consumers evaluate paradox brands more favorably and choose paradox brands more than traditional brands without contradictions. Furthermore, bicultural consumers exhibit more favorable evaluations and greater choice of paradox brands than do monocultural consumers. These cultural differences are attributable to greater cognitive flexibility found among biculturals, particularly those who adopt an acculturation strategy of integrating their different cultural identities. Greater cognitive flexibility, in turn, prompts stronger engagement with a paradox brand, which contributes to more favorable brand evaluations and choice. Contributions of this research for understanding bicultural consumers, marketing to bicultural consumers, and directions for future research are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria A Rodas & Deborah Roedder John & Carlos J Torelli & Margaret C Campbell & Stefano Puntoni, 2021. "Building Brands for the Emerging Bicultural Market: The Appeal of Paradox Brands," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 48(4), pages 633-650.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:633-650.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jcr/ucab037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jconrs:v:48:y:2021:i:4:p:633-650.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.