IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v19y2023i3p427-443..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public and Private Sanctions for Corporate Misconduct: Evidence From Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Clara Cardone-Riportella
  • Myriam García-Olalla
  • Camilo J Vázquez-Ordás

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the impact that the application of competition legislation exerts on financial markets. The sanctioning process is classified into three key moments: the announcement of an investigation when a case of corporate misconduct is suspected; the imposition of a fine, if applicable; and, finally, the rectification or ratification of the sanction. The impact of these announcements on share prices between 2013 and 2021 is analyzed using the event study methodology. This research focuses on companies listed on the Spanish stock exchange, yielding 22 firms with 95 observations. The results show a negative and significant market reaction to the series of announcements. While this reaction intensifies if the fine is ratified, the response becomes positive when the sanction is rectified and annulled. In conclusion, the evidence found allows us to state that the market does in effect penalize corporate misconduct. Furthermore, the public sanction imposed by the competent authority is then followed by a private sanction, which manifests itself as a drop in market value. This is consistent with a hypothetical effect of reputational loss, especially in those cases in which the sanction is more significant in relation to the company’s market value.

Suggested Citation

  • Clara Cardone-Riportella & Myriam García-Olalla & Camilo J Vázquez-Ordás, 2023. "Public and Private Sanctions for Corporate Misconduct: Evidence From Listed Companies," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 427-443.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:19:y:2023:i:3:p:427-443.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhad010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:19:y:2023:i:3:p:427-443.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.