IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jcomle/v18y2022i4p953-987..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Competitive Effects of China’s Legal Data Regime

Author

Listed:
  • Tamar Giladi Shtub
  • Michal S Gal

Abstract

The global race for data-based technological superiority is on. In a world where “data are the new oil,” data-based comparative advantages may affect not only competition between firms but also the balance of power among jurisdictions. In the past two decades, China has made important strides in gaining such advantages. Some of China’s comparative advantages are natural. For example, its population size creates unparalleled potential for harvesting data. Some are cultural, such as the traditionally low significance of Western-style privacy concerns. This research focuses on a third, often overlooked, source: comparative advantages created by China’s data regime—the system of policies, laws, regulations, and practices that govern or influence the data value chain. The article provides a detailed outline of China’s data regime and offers analysis of its possible competitive effects on China and on other jurisdictions. This analysis also provides a wider context for understanding China’s recent competition law actions against Chinese technology giants, after years of extremely lax policy. Indeed, as this article shows, to fully understand China’s actions, it is necessary to consider not only its competition law enforcement but also other ways in which the government is involved in the data value chain.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamar Giladi Shtub & Michal S Gal, 2022. "The Competitive Effects of China’s Legal Data Regime," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 953-987.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:18:y:2022:i:4:p:953-987.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/joclec/nhac007
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jcomle:v:18:y:2022:i:4:p:953-987.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/jcle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.