IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jafrec/v21y2012i4p609-636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network Structure and Innovative Performance of African Entrepreneurs: The Case of Uganda-super- †

Author

Listed:
  • Gerrit Rooks
  • Adam Szirmai
  • Arthur Sserwanga

Abstract

In this study, we examine the impact of social capital on entrepreneurial innovativeness in an African context. Social capital refers to resources that are embedded in a durable network of relationships. This article focuses specifically on the structure of networks. There are two main views on the relation between network structure and entrepreneurial performance. One view argues that closed networks are beneficial for cooperation and resource sharing, which is needed to implement an innovation, while another view argues that closed networks constrain entrepreneurs, since it is open networks that provide entrepreneurs with fresh information and ideas. Based on these arguments, we hypothesise that the relationship between the degree of constraint of a network and innovative performance has an inverted U-shape. We also examine the hypothesis that overlap between personal and business networks will hamper innovative performance of entrepreneurs because information will be less diverse and heterogeneous, and because re-distributive kinship obligations may act as a drain on entrepreneurial resources. We test our hypotheses using a recent survey of about 700 Ugandan rural and urban entrepreneurs. Our hypotheses are supported in the urban sample, but not in the rural sample. Copyright 2012 , Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerrit Rooks & Adam Szirmai & Arthur Sserwanga, 2012. "Network Structure and Innovative Performance of African Entrepreneurs: The Case of Uganda-super- †," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 21(4), pages 609-636, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:21:y:2012:i:4:p:609-636
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/jae/ejs011
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dorgyles C.M. Kouakou, 2022. "Separating innovation short-run and long-run technical efficiencies: Evidence from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 19(1), pages 103-141, June.
    2. Dorgyles C.M. Kouakou, 2022. "Separating innovation short-run and long-run technical efficiencies: Evidence from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 19(1), pages 103-141, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:21:y:2012:i:4:p:609-636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.