IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/jafrec/v11y2002i4p441-471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bypassing Health Centres in Tanzania: Revealed Preferences for Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth L. Leonard
  • Gilbert R. Mliga
  • Damen Haile Mariam

Abstract

When patients bypass one health facility to seek care at another, strong preferences are revealed. The patterns of bypassing observed in Iringa Rural district in Tanzania show evidence of patients' understanding of various measures of quality at the facilities that they visit and bypass. We match two data sets that measured quality in health facilities with a sample of patient choice of health facilities. We use a conditional logit regression on patient choice of provider to show the relationship between patient behaviour and objective measures of technical quality in the health facilities. The paper shows that patients seek facilities that provide high quality consultations and prescriptions, are staffed by more knowledgeable physicians, and are better stocked with basic supplies. Patients avoid facilities that use injections too liberally or over-prescribe medication. Furthermore, the patterns differ significantly by illness condition and show evidence that patients understand the relative importance of these qualities for the condition from which they suffer. Copyright 2002, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth L. Leonard & Gilbert R. Mliga & Damen Haile Mariam, 2002. "Bypassing Health Centres in Tanzania: Revealed Preferences for Quality," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 11(4), pages 441-471, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:11:y:2002:i:4:p:441-471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:jafrec:v:11:y:2002:i:4:p:441-471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.