IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indlaw/v51y2022i1p84-108..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of Digitalisation on Employment Relationships and the Need for more Democracy at Work

Author

Listed:
  • Kurt Pärli

Abstract

The world of labour is in transformation due to automation, digitalisation and platform work. Digitalisation is changing the classic relationship between employer and employee; this also affects workers’ participation rights within the company. New forms of work demand very high self-organisation and active commitment on the part of employees to solving process problems and optimising processes. If at the same time management and organisational structures remain largely top-down and employees hardly have any say, this is contradictory. Co-determination is a central component of qualified work. Without the expansion of democratic processes within the company, the opportunities offered by digitalisation will not be fully exploited. Digital processes require cooperation across technical, departmental, and hierarchical boundaries, which must inevitably lead to the democratisation of company decisions. Digitalisation may also act as a catalyst for the dormant debate about “democracy in the workplace”.

Suggested Citation

  • Kurt Pärli, 2022. "Impacts of Digitalisation on Employment Relationships and the Need for more Democracy at Work," Industrial Law Journal, Industrial Law Society, vol. 51(1), pages 84-108.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:51:y:2022:i:1:p:84-108.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/indlaw/dwaa029
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indlaw:v:51:y:2022:i:1:p:84-108.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ilj .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.