IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v32y2023i6p1217-1244..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From organizational capabilities to corporate performances: at the roots of productivity slowdown

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Costa
  • Stefano De Santis
  • Giovanni Dosi
  • Roberto Monducci
  • Angelica Sbardella
  • Maria Enrica

Abstract

This paper is one of the first attempts at empirically identifying organizational capabilities—in this work concerning Italian firms. Together, it proposes new evidence on the link between capabilities and economic performances. To this aim, we employ the Indagine Multiscopo del Censimento Permanente delle Imprese (IMCPI), a survey carried out by the Italian Statistical Office (ISTAT) in 2019, covering the three-year period 2016–2018, addressing a wide range of organizational characteristics including various organizational routines, human resource management (HRM), internationalization strategies, and many others. Our contribution is threefold: first, we aim at detecting what practices and combinations of them result in underlying different capabilities; second, we propose a taxonomy of the production system, both at firm- and sector-level based on the mapping of such capabilities; and third, we study the performance outcomes of different capability taxa in terms of productivity growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Costa & Stefano De Santis & Giovanni Dosi & Roberto Monducci & Angelica Sbardella & Maria Enrica, 2023. "From organizational capabilities to corporate performances: at the roots of productivity slowdown," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(6), pages 1217-1244.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:32:y:2023:i:6:p:1217-1244.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtad030
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:32:y:2023:i:6:p:1217-1244.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.