IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v32y2023i1p47-60..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is modularity robust to misfits? A formal test

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Fang
  • Ji-hyun Jason Kim

Abstract

In this paper, we ask—is the power of modularity robust to a potential misfit between organizations and their underlying technical systems? We design a computational model to systematically explore the role of misfits, building on prior models using the numerical NK paradigm. We find that the impact of misfits is either neutral or even performance-enhancing when the organizations carry out a decentralized search while coordinating and evaluating the alternatives at the organizational level. This is good news for the theoretical efficacy of modularity—the benefits of modular search do not have to be contingent upon a precise understanding of the underlying technical dependencies. The reason is that in decentralized and hierarchical systems, there exists a tension between (i) the exploration and generation of alternatives and (ii) the exercise of restraint and control. The latter is important to implement only those alternatives that have an overall positive impact on the organization, by limiting the downside of radical experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Fang & Ji-hyun Jason Kim, 2023. "Is modularity robust to misfits? A formal test," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(1), pages 47-60.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:47-60.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtac031
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:32:y:2023:i:1:p:47-60.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.