Author
Listed:
- Alessandro Zeli
- Matilde Bini
- Leopoldo Nascia
Abstract
In Italy, productivity had a turning point in the second half of the 1990s, when it went into decline. During the last few years, productivity in Italy has been sluggish, with an even more marked decreasing trend. Studies on companies’ performances, regarding productivity growth, have highlighted different aspects and various concomitant factors. Many analyses focused on the lack of investment and productivity differentials related to export activity. Indeed, productivity growth is a multidimensional problem that can be approached by following the evolution of various factors, such as profitability, labor costs, growth of aggregate demand, and investment. This work aims at identifying and analyzing, at the microlevel, the determinants of labor productivity over the whole period 2004–2013, and in the two sub-periods before and after the 2007 crisis. The goal is to determine the factors that have most influenced the change in the productivity of manufacturing companies in the period considered. Moreover, we focus on those elements that permit firms to survive a crisis, and on the presence of other factors that can, instead, accelerate a crisis. To carry out this analysis, firms have to be tracked over time, so a panel of companies’ financial reports was used to create a transition matrix, and econometric models are proposed to estimate productivity determinants. We highlight the centrality of the labor market in explaining the main economic evolution, also in recent years, and the factors that have pushed Italy’s move towards a labor-intensive development model.
Suggested Citation
Alessandro Zeli & Matilde Bini & Leopoldo Nascia, 2022.
"A longitudinal analysis of Italian manufacturing companies’ labor productivity in the period 2004–2013,"
Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(4), pages 1004-1030.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:indcch:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:1004-1030.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:1004-1030.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.