IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v31y2022i3p783-810..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reallocation and productivity during the Great Recession: evidence from French manufacturing firms
[Turbulence, firm decentralization, and growth in bad times]

Author

Listed:
  • Giacomo Domini
  • Daniele Moschella

Abstract

According to the ‘cleansing hypothesis’, recessions are periods in which productivity-enhancing reallocation intensifies, shifting resources away from less efficient to more efficient firms at a faster pace. Does the Great Recession of 2008–2010 fit this view? We address this question, studying the case of the French manufacturing sector. Based on a panel of firms, built by matching several data sources, we analyze the dynamics of the relation between productivity and reallocation over the period 2002–2013. Our results show that, during the Great Recession, more productive firms decreased their advantage with respect to less productive firms, in terms of both employment growth and probability to survive, in disagreement with the cleansing hypothesis. This attenuation of productivity-enhancing reallocation was significantly driven by the trade collapse and credit crunch that were associated with the crisis, while it does not emerge to depend on labor-market regulations and anti-crisis policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Giacomo Domini & Daniele Moschella, 2022. "Reallocation and productivity during the Great Recession: evidence from French manufacturing firms [Turbulence, firm decentralization, and growth in bad times]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(3), pages 783-810.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:31:y:2022:i:3:p:783-810.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtab075
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:31:y:2022:i:3:p:783-810.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.