IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v22y2013i6p1587-1628.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupations at risk: job tasks, job security, and wages

Author

Listed:
  • Ljubica Nedelkoska

Abstract

Germany, similar to other developed countries, witnessed a sharp decline in jobs that used to constitute the middle class in the 1970s and 1980s. This decline has been associated with the level to which jobs are codifiable. There is evidence that codifiable tasks are more prone to technological substitution and outsourcing compared with tacit tasks. This article empirically investigates two crucial aspects of the decline in codified jobs. First, it studies what happened to workers in codified occupations in terms of unemployment, occupational change, and wages. Second, it revisits the hypothesis that code-based technologies are the major driver of this labor market shift. We find that job codification is associated with both higher unemployment and higher occupational change. It is also associated with wage losses for workers who left routinized jobs. We find, however, little evidence that code-based technologies were the driving factor behind these dynamics. Copyright 2013 The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Ljubica Nedelkoska, 2013. "Occupations at risk: job tasks, job security, and wages," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(6), pages 1587-1628, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:22:y:2013:i:6:p:1587-1628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dtt002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:22:y:2013:i:6:p:1587-1628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.