IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/indcch/v22y2013i1p33-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competing inventors and the incentive to invent

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel F. Spulber

Abstract

This article introduces a comprehensive model of the market for inventions that examines how both supply-side competition and demand-side competition affect the incentive to invent. Supply-side competition refers to competition among inventors and demand-side competition refers to competition among producers in the downstream product market. The main results are as follows. Competing inventors have greater average expected returns to invention when the downstream market is competitive than when the downstream product market is monopolistic, so downstream competition increases the incentive to invent. A multi-project monopoly inventor has greater incremental expected returns to invention when the downstream market is competitive than when it is monopolistic, so downstream competition again increases the incentive to invent. On the supply side, competition among inventors generates more R&D projects than a multi-project monopoly inventor when the demand side of the market for inventions is competitive. The reason for this result is that when the downstream market is competitive, the average expected returns to invention with competition among inventors are greater than the incremental expected returns to invention with a multi-project monopoly inventor. Copyright 2013 The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel F. Spulber, 2013. "Competing inventors and the incentive to invent," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 22(1), pages 33-72, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:22:y:2013:i:1:p:33-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/icc/dts013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anzhou Zhang, 2022. "Competition and the negative expected social value of cost‐reducing innovation," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 90(1), pages 59-76, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:indcch:v:22:y:2013:i:1:p:33-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/icc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.