IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v79y2024i2p435-446..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insights Into Informal Caregivers’ Well-being: A Longitudinal Analysis of Care Intensity, Care Location, and Care Relationship

Author

Listed:
  • Yanan Zhang
  • Matthew R Bennett
  • Jessica Kelley

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study investigates the psychological well-being of informal caregivers over time. It identifies the thresholds (or “tipping points”) of caring intensity at which caregiving is associated with lower psychological well-being, and how this varies by care location and caregiver–care recipient relationships. It also examines how caring location and relationship are linked to informal caregivers’ psychological well-being while controlling for caring intensity.MethodsWaves 1–18 (1991–2009) of the harmonized British Household Panel Survey and Waves 1–8 (2009–2017) of the U.K. Household Longitudinal Study were analyzed. Psychological well-being was measured using the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 score. Care intensity was measured by the weekly hours of care provided. Fixed-effects estimators were applied to the GHQ-12 score of caregivers across different care intensities, caring locations, and caring relationships.ResultsAll levels of informal care intensity are associated with lower psychological well-being among spousal caregivers. The thresholds to well-being are 5 hours per week when caring for a parent, and 50 hours per week when caring for a child (with a disability or long-term illness). Caring for “other relatives” or nonrelatives is not negatively associated with psychological well-being. The thresholds are 5 hours per week for both coresident and extraresident caregivers. Extraresident caregivers experience better psychological well-being compared to coresident caregivers, given relatively lower weekly care hours. Caring for primary kin (especially spouses) is linked to lower psychological well-being compared to other caregiving relationships, regardless of care intensity.DiscussionPolicy and practice responses should pay particular attention to spousal caregivers’ well-being. Caregiving relationship has a stronger association with the caregiver’s well-being than care location.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanan Zhang & Matthew R Bennett & Jessica Kelley, 2024. "Insights Into Informal Caregivers’ Well-being: A Longitudinal Analysis of Care Intensity, Care Location, and Care Relationship," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 79(2), pages 435-446.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:2:p:435-446.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad166
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:2:p:435-446.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.