IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i8p1402-1411..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Income Pooling in Midlife: A Comparison of Remarried and Cohabiting Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew R Wright
  • Tatum A Schwartz
  • Susan L Brown
  • Wendy D Manning

Abstract

ObjectivesThe share of adults cohabiting at later ages has risen in the past few decades, though little is known about income pooling among midlife cohabitors. Cohabitation could be an attractive option because partners may be able to preserve their economic autonomy and maintain assets for the next generation. Conversely, cohabitation may operate as an alternative to marriage, allowing midlife adults to combine their resources to achieve economies of scale without the legal obligations of marriage. This study compared income pooling among middle-aged remarried and cohabiting adults in the United States.MethodsData were from the nationally representative 2013 Families and Relationships Survey. The analytic sample included adults aged 50–65 who were cohabiting or remarried (N = 888). Logistic regression models were used to predict the likelihood of income pooling among cohabiting and remarried midlife adults, net of relationship, demographic, and economic characteristics.ResultsAligning with the hypothesis that cohabitation and remarriage are distinct in middle age, the odds of income pooling were lower for cohabitors than remarrieds. However, the gap between cohabitors and remarrieds narrowed by later ages.DiscussionThis study provides insight into the economic organization of midlife cohabiting relationships, which may have implications for individual well-being and relationship decision-making among middle-aged couples.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew R Wright & Tatum A Schwartz & Susan L Brown & Wendy D Manning, 2023. "Income Pooling in Midlife: A Comparison of Remarried and Cohabiting Relationships," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(8), pages 1402-1411.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:8:p:1402-1411.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad051
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:8:p:1402-1411.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.