IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i6p977-986..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Flexibility of Solution Strategy: Strategy Shifting as a Measure of Cognitive Reserve

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Barulli
  • Christian Habeck
  • Yaakov Stern
  • Vanessa Taler

Abstract

ObjectivesThis series of experiments explores whether flexibility in strategy shifting might function as an expression of cognitive reserve (CR).MethodsA reasoning task was designed using matrix reasoning stimuli that each required 1 of 2 specific solution strategies: logicoanalytic and visuospatial. It was formatted as a task-switching paradigm, assessing the ability to switch between solution strategies as measured by switch costs. Study 1 was done on Amazon Mechanical Turk and included an assessment of CR proxies. Study 2 used participants who had been studied extensively with neuropsychological assessments and structural neuroimaging.ResultsStudy 1 found that switch costs increased with aging. In addition, a relationship between switch costs and CR proxies was noted, suggesting a relationship between the flexibility of strategy shifting and CR. The results of Study 2 again indicated that age negatively affected strategy-shifting flexibility, but that individuals with higher CR as measured with standard proxies performed better. The flexibility measure accounted for additional variance in cognitive performance over that explained by cortical thickness, suggesting that it may contribute to CR.DiscussionOverall, the results are consistent with the idea that flexibility in strategy shifting might be 1 cognitive process that underlies cognitive reserve.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Barulli & Christian Habeck & Yaakov Stern & Vanessa Taler, 2023. "Assessing Flexibility of Solution Strategy: Strategy Shifting as a Measure of Cognitive Reserve," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(6), pages 977-986.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:6:p:977-986.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:6:p:977-986.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.