IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i10p1642-1650..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Executive Function Predicts Older Adults’ Lure Discrimination Difficulties on the Mnemonic Similarity Task

Author

Listed:
  • Adelaide Jensen
  • Galit Karpov
  • Charles A Collin
  • Patrick S R Davidson
  • Anne Krendl

Abstract

ObjectivesOlder adults often have difficulty remembering the details of recently encountered objects. We previously found this with the Mnemonic Similarity Task (MST). Surprisingly, the older adults’ MST Lure Discrimination Index (LDI) was significantly correlated with visual acuity but not with memory or executive function. Here we ran a replication with new, larger samples of young (N = 45) and older adults (N = 70). We then combined the original and replication older adult samples (N = 108) to critically examine the relative contributions of visual acuity, memory, and executive function composite scores to LDI performance using dominance analysis. This provided, to our knowledge, the first direct statistical comparison of all 3 of these factors and their interactions on LDI.MethodsParticipants completed the MST and a battery assessing visual acuity, memory, and executive function. We examined age group differences on MST performance in the new (i.e., replication) young and older adult samples and performed multiple regression and dominance analysis on the combined older adult sample.ResultsConsistent with previous findings, the older adults showed significantly poorer LDI but preserved item recognition. LDI was significantly correlated with both memory and executive function but not with visual acuity. In the combined older adult sample, all 3 composites predicted LDI, but dominance analysis indicated that executive function was the most important predictor.DiscussionOlder adults’ MST LDI difficulty may be predicted by their executive function and visual acuity. These factors should be considered when interpreting older adults’ MST performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Adelaide Jensen & Galit Karpov & Charles A Collin & Patrick S R Davidson & Anne Krendl, 2023. "Executive Function Predicts Older Adults’ Lure Discrimination Difficulties on the Mnemonic Similarity Task," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(10), pages 1642-1650.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:10:p:1642-1650.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad091
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:10:p:1642-1650.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.