IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i3p467-471..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Delay Duration on Delay Discounting Across Adulthood

Author

Listed:
  • Shelby Leverett
  • Christopher Garza
  • Kendra Seaman
  • Angela Gutchess

Abstract

ObjectivesLiterature about the relationship between age and delay discounting, or the willingness to wait for delayed rewards, is mixed. We posit that some of this heterogeneity may be attributable to inconsistent delay durations across studies. Here we investigate how delay duration influences discounting across adulthood by systematically varying the duration of the delay between the smaller, sooner and the larger, later option.Methods288 healthy participants (age range: 25–84 years) completed an online delay discounting task that probed 12 different time delays across 3 discount rates. Discounting was analyzed in 2 statistical models that treated delay duration as either a categorical or a continuous predictor.ResultsLonger delays were generally associated with decreased discounting. However, this was dependent on both age of the participant and delay duration. Both models revealed that, at short to moderate time delays, older adults discounted less than younger adults. However, at very long delays (5 and 10 years), older adults discounted at similar rates to younger adults.DiscussionResults suggest that delay length can moderate the relationship between age and discounting. Using delays longer than those tested here (>10 years) could reveal yet another trend (i.e., a reversal) to those found here. Future research should investigate whether this reversal in discounting exists, why it exists, and where the inflection point lies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shelby Leverett & Christopher Garza & Kendra Seaman & Angela Gutchess, 2022. "The Effect of Delay Duration on Delay Discounting Across Adulthood," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(3), pages 467-471.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:3:p:467-471.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab198
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:3:p:467-471.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.