IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i2p407-412..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Determinants of Shingles Vaccination in the United States
[The Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis: A case study in peripheral trauma with implications for health professionals]

Author

Listed:
  • Eric M Vogelsang
  • Andrea N Polonijo

Abstract

ObjectiveOnly about one-third of older adults in the United States are vaccinated against shingles, contributing to approximately 1 million shingles cases annually. This study examines how sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors, and self-rated health are associated with shingles vaccine uptake.MethodData come from the 2017 wave of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey, using a subset of older adults aged 60-plus (N = 208,301). Logistic regression models test (a) for associations between individual-level sociodemographic characteristics and vaccine uptake and (b) whether health behaviors and self-rated health moderate these associations.ResultsBlack and Hispanic older adults have almost 50% lower odds of shingles vaccination, compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Abstaining from alcohol, being employed, living with children, and having poor self-rated health are also associated with lower uptake. Unmarried (vs married) individuals have lower odds of vaccination that are explained by broad differences in health behavior.DiscussionOur study contributes to understanding how shingles vaccination coverage systematically differs among social groups. In doing so, it provides guidance for public health interventions to increase uptake. This line of research is increasingly salient in a world facing novel virus threats and antivaccine social movements.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric M Vogelsang & Andrea N Polonijo, 2022. "Social Determinants of Shingles Vaccination in the United States [The Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis: A case study in peripheral trauma with implications for health professionals]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(2), pages 407-412.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:2:p:407-412.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab074
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:2:p:407-412.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.