IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i1p61-70..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective Age and Late-Life Functional Status: Mediating and Moderating Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Joel R Petashnick
  • Amit Shrira
  • Yaakov Hoffman
  • Yuval Palgi
  • Gitit Kavé
  • Dov Shmotkin

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study examined the longitudinal relationships between subjective age (SA) and future functional status in later life, via depressive symptoms. Additionally, we assessed the role of subjective nearness to death (SNtD) as a potential moderator within these pathways.MethodsOlder adults (average age 81.14 years at T1) were interviewed once a year for 3 consecutive years (N = 224 at T1, N = 178 at T2, and N = 164 at T3). Participants reported their SA, SNtD, depressive symptoms, and functional status. Additionally, grip strength was employed as an objective measure of functional status.ResultsData analysis revealed distinct pathways leading from T1 SA to T3 functional status through T2 depressive symptoms. Moreover, T1 SNtD was found to significantly moderate most of these indirect pathways, so that the mediation model of T1 SA–T2 depressive symptoms–T3 functional status was mostly significant among those who felt closer to death.DiscussionThe findings contribute to our understanding of the underlying mechanism through which SA predicts long-term functioning sequelae by underscoring the indirect effect of depressive symptoms. They further indicate the importance of gauging the effects of SNtD on these longitudinal relationships. Present results may further contribute to establishing an integrative model for predicting long-term functional outcomes based on older adults’ earlier subjective views of aging.

Suggested Citation

  • Joel R Petashnick & Amit Shrira & Yaakov Hoffman & Yuval Palgi & Gitit Kavé & Dov Shmotkin, 2022. "Subjective Age and Late-Life Functional Status: Mediating and Moderating Effects," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(1), pages 61-70.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:1:p:61-70.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab181
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:1:p:61-70.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.