IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i5p836-844..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Day-to-Day Variability in Subjective Age and Ageist Attitudes and Their Association With Depressive Symptoms
[Dynamic, not stable: Daily variations in subjective age bias and age group identification predict daily well-being in older workers]

Author

Listed:
  • Ehud Bodner
  • Amit Shrira
  • Yaakov Hoffman
  • Yoav S Bergman
  • Shevaun Neupert

Abstract

ObjectivesEvidence of daily fluctuations in subjective age and their association with older adults’ well-being was recently obtained. Yet, neither the simultaneous tracking of two daily views on aging (i.e., daily subjective age and daily ageist attitudes) nor their interactive effect on mental health (i.e., depressive symptoms) has been explored. We hypothesized that (a) at days on which older adults feel older or report high ageist attitudes they would report higher depressive symptoms, (b) combined older subjective age and high ageist attitudes will be associated with the highest daily depressive symptoms.MethodCommunity-dwelling older adults (N = 134, mean age = 69.66) completed measures of subjective age, ageist attitudes, and depressive symptoms for 10 consecutive days.ResultsDaily older subjective age and higher ageist attitudes were related to higher depressive symptoms, but there was no combined effect of both on depressive symptoms. There was a significant three-way interaction between subjective age, ageist attitudes, and chronological age, demonstrating the interactive effect of subjective age and ageist attitudes on depressive symptoms only among the old-old respondents. Time-lagged analyses further showed that ageist attitudes during previous days predicted feeling older and more depressed on following days, but not vice versa.DiscussionResults suggest that old-old individuals are more susceptible to a combination of negative views on aging on daily basis. Findings further support a daily assimilation process, whereby previous-day stereotypes are assimilated and manifested into one’s identity and mental health, so that one feels older and more depressed on subsequent days.

Suggested Citation

  • Ehud Bodner & Amit Shrira & Yaakov Hoffman & Yoav S Bergman & Shevaun Neupert, 2021. "Day-to-Day Variability in Subjective Age and Ageist Attitudes and Their Association With Depressive Symptoms [Dynamic, not stable: Daily variations in subjective age bias and age group identificati," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(5), pages 836-844.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:5:p:836-844.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaa125
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dikla Segel-Karpas & Amit Shrira & Ella Cohn-Schwartz & Ehud Bodner, 2022. "Daily fluctuations in subjective age and depressive symptoms: the roles of attitudes to ageing and chronological age," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 741-751, September.
    2. Jin Wang & Jiabin Yu & Xiaoguang Zhao, 2022. "Is Subjective Age Associated with Physical Fitness in Community-Dwelling Older Adults?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-10, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:5:p:836-844.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.