IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i2p283-288..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spousal Influences on Monthly Disability in Late-Life Marriage in the Precipitating Events Project

Author

Listed:
  • Joan K Monin
  • Holly Laws
  • Evelyne Gahbauer
  • Terrence E Murphy
  • Thomas M Gill
  • Lynn Martire

Abstract

ObjectivesFew studies have examined spousal influences on disability in late-life marriage, and no prior study has examined these associations using monthly data. Drawing from interdependence theory, we hypothesized that one spouse currently having higher disability would be positively associated with their partner having higher disability in the next month. We also examined whether participants were at risk for increased disability when both spouses had higher prior disability. In addition, we examined gender differences in spousal associations.MethodData were from 37 married couples in the Precipitating Events Project, an ongoing longitudinal study of 754 initially nondisabled adults aged 70 years and older. Assessments included monthly disability (13 basic, instrumental, and mobility activities of daily living) and demographics.ResultsAs hypothesized, higher disability in one spouse was positively associated with higher subsequent disability in their partner. Also, wives with higher disability were especially vulnerable to subsequent increased disability when husbands had higher disability.DiscussionIncorporating a spouse’s current disability level in modeling older adults’ subsequent disability provides additional predictive information. Wives with greater disability may be at a particularly high risk of accelerated decline when their husbands have greater disability.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan K Monin & Holly Laws & Evelyne Gahbauer & Terrence E Murphy & Thomas M Gill & Lynn Martire, 2021. "Spousal Influences on Monthly Disability in Late-Life Marriage in the Precipitating Events Project," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(2), pages 283-288.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:2:p:283-288.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaa006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:2:p:283-288.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.