IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i10p2086-2094..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Positive Affect Related to Meaning in Life Differently in Younger and Older Adults? A Time Sampling Study

Author

Listed:
  • Steven Tsun-Wai Chu
  • Helene H Fung
  • Li Chu
  • Shevaun Neupert

Abstract

ObjectivesPrior studies have found that as people age, they value low-arousal positive affect (LAP) to a greater extent and high-arousal positive affect (HAP) to a lower extent. We aimed to investigate whether actually achieving those ideal affects was related to better well-being outcomes, measured in terms of meaning in life.MethodsUsing a time sampling design across 14 days (N = 162), we investigated whether the experience of LAP and HAP was related to the experience of meaning in life and how these associations differed across younger and older adults in Hong Kong.ResultsBoth LAP and HAP contributed to the experience of meaning in life for both younger and older adults. The global effect of LAP on meaning in life was stronger for older than younger adults, whereas the momentary effect of HAP on meaning in life was stronger for younger adults than older adults.DiscussionFindings suggest that achieving ideal affect is related to better eudaimonic well-being outcomes. People of different age groups know how they want to feel. Actually achieving the feelings endorsed by one’s age group is associated with higher meaningfulness of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Steven Tsun-Wai Chu & Helene H Fung & Li Chu & Shevaun Neupert, 2020. "Is Positive Affect Related to Meaning in Life Differently in Younger and Older Adults? A Time Sampling Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(10), pages 2086-2094.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:10:p:2086-2094.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz086
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:10:p:2086-2094.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.