IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v73y2018i8p1416-1424..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mainland Chinese Implicit Theory of Wisdom: Generational and Cultural Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Chao S Hu
  • Michel Ferrari
  • Ru-De Liu
  • Qin Gao
  • Ethan Weare

Abstract

Objectives This is the first study on the Mainland Chinese implicit theory of wisdom. To understand the role of culture and social changes in the implicit theory of wisdom, cultural and generational differences were explored. Method Two generations of Mainland Chinese, 50 older adults (age 60–80 years) and 50 younger adults (age 20–30 years), were interviewed individually. Participants first nominated personal acquaintances and historical figures as wisdom exemplars and then gave their own definition of wisdom. Results Compared with the older generation, the younger generation nominated both acquaintance scholars and historical scholars more frequently, but acquaintance classmates & colleagues and historical leaders less frequently. Common themes of all participants’ definition of wisdom partially resembled those of Western studies, yet with components that related to Chinese traditions: “Spirituality of disengagement†and “Positive mindset.†Moreover, older generation emphasized “Cognitive engagement†more, but “Positive mindset†and “Spirituality of disengagement†less, than the younger generation. Discussion Wisdom aspects of cognitive, practical, and social engagement may be more universal and intergenerational, whereas wisdom aspects of “spirituality†and “mindset†may be more culturally specific and sensitive to social change.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao S Hu & Michel Ferrari & Ru-De Liu & Qin Gao & Ethan Weare, 2018. "Mainland Chinese Implicit Theory of Wisdom: Generational and Cultural Differences," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 73(8), pages 1416-1424.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:8:p:1416-1424.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbw157
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith Glück & Susan Bluck, 2011. "Laypeople's Conceptions of Wisdom and Its Development: Cognitive and Integrative Views," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(3), pages 321-324.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasilios Gialamas & Sofia Iliadou Tachou & Alexia Orfanou, 2016. "Negotiating Boundaries Between Gender and Social Identities in the Principality of Samos: The Case of Divorces (1902-1911)," European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, September.
    2. Ajit Nayak, 2016. "Wisdom and the Tragic Question: Moral Learning and Emotional Perception in Leadership and Organisations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:73:y:2018:i:8:p:1416-1424.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.