IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v72y2017i5p801-812..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limited Benefits of Heterogeneous Dual-Task Training on Transfer Effects in Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Maxime Lussier
  • Philippe Brouillard
  • Louis Bherer

Abstract

ObjectivesIt has often been reported that cognitive training has limited transfer effects. The present study addresses training context variability as a factor that could increase transfer effects, as well as the manifestation through time of transfer effects.MethodFifty-eight older adults were assigned to an active placebo or two dual-task training conditions, one in which the training context varies between sessions (heterogeneous training) and the other in a fixed training context (homogeneous training). Transfer was assessed with near and far-modality transfer tasks.ResultsResults show that heterogeneous and homogeneous training led to larger near-modality transfer effects than an active placebo (computer lessons). Transfer effects were roughly comparable in both training groups, but heterogeneous training led to a steeper improvement of the dual-task coordination learning curve within training sessions. Also, results indicated that dual-task cost did not improve in the active placebo group from the pre- to the post-training sessions.DiscussionHeterogeneous training showed modest advantages over homogeneous training. Results also suggest that transfer effects on dual-task cost induced by training take place early on in the post-training session. These findings provide valuable insights on benefits arising from variability in the training protocol for maximizing transfer effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Maxime Lussier & Philippe Brouillard & Louis Bherer, 2017. "Limited Benefits of Heterogeneous Dual-Task Training on Transfer Effects in Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(5), pages 801-812.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:5:p:801-812.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbv105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:72:y:2017:i:5:p:801-812.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.