IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ecpoli/v28y2013i73p45-100..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Educational policies in a long-run perspective
[The governance and performance of universities: evidence from Europe and the U.S]

Author

Listed:
  • Michela Braga
  • Daniele Checchi
  • Elena Meschi

Abstract

In this paper we study the effects of educational reforms on school attainment. We construct a dataset of relevant reforms that occurred at the national level over the last century, and match individual information from 24 European countries to the most likely set-up faced when individual educational choices were undertaken. Our identification strategy relies on temporal and geographical variations in the institutional arrangements, controlling for time/country fixed effects, as well as for country specific time trend. By characterizing each group of reforms for their impact on mean years of education, educational inequality and intergenerational persistence, we show an ideal policy menu which has been available to policymakers. We distinguish between groups of policies that are either ‘inclusive’ or ‘selective’, depending on their diminishing or augmenting impact on inequality and persistence. Finally, we correlate these reform measures to political coalitions prevailing in parliament, finding support for the idea that left-wing parties support reforms that are inclusive, while right-wing parties prefer selective ones.— Michela Braga, Daniele Checchi and Elena Meschi

Suggested Citation

  • Michela Braga & Daniele Checchi & Elena Meschi, 2013. "Educational policies in a long-run perspective [The governance and performance of universities: evidence from Europe and the U.S]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 28(73), pages 45-100.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:28:y:2013:i:73:p:45-100.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1468-0327.12002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:28:y:2013:i:73:p:45-100.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebruuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.