IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ecpoli/v27y2012i70p319-359..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial frictions, financial integration and the international propagation of shocks
[Optimal monetary policy under commitment with a zero bound on nominal interest rates]

Author

Listed:
  • Luca Dedola
  • Giovanni Lombardo

Abstract

The recent Great Recession has been particularly remarkable not only for its unprecedented severity, but also for the exceptional degree of global interdependence in financial and real variables. A much-discussed channel of propagation hinges on the international exposure of the balance sheet of highly leveraged players to ‘toxic’ US assets. Yet, existing evidence on the role of exposure is mixed at best. This paper argues that under financial integration, the fact that leveraged investors face the same returns across internationally traded assets, would tend to equalize their borrowing cost across countries. Model simulations show that an unexpected increase in credit spreads in one country generates a similar increase in credit spreads in other financially integrated countries bringing about a global contraction, quite independently of the exposure to foreign assets in the balance sheet of leveraged investors. Our analysis thus suggests some caution in assessing the risks of ‘contagion’ on the exclusive basis of quantitative measures of integration based on cross-border balance sheet exposure.— Luca Dedola and Giovanni Lombardo

Suggested Citation

  • Luca Dedola & Giovanni Lombardo, 2012. "Financial frictions, financial integration and the international propagation of shocks [Optimal monetary policy under commitment with a zero bound on nominal interest rates]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 27(70), pages 319-359.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:27:y:2012:i:70:p:319-359.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2012.00286.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ecpoli:v:27:y:2012:i:70:p:319-359.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebruuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.