IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v134y2023i657p436-456..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Management Practices and Quality of Care: Evidence from the Private Health Care Sector in Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Powell-Jackson
  • Jessica J C King
  • Christina Makungu
  • Matthew Quaife
  • Catherine Goodman

Abstract

We measure the adoption of management practices in over 220 private for-profit and non-profit health facilities in 64 districts across Tanzania and link these data to process quality-of-care metrics, assessed using undercover standardised patients and clinical observations. We find that better managed health facilities are more likely to provide correct treatment in accordance with national treatment guidelines, adhere to a checklist of essential questions and examinations, and comply with infection prevention and control practices. Moving from the 10th to the 90th percentile in the management practice score is associated with a 48% increase in correct treatment. We then leverage a large-scale field experiment of an internationally recognised management support intervention in which health facilities are assessed against comprehensive standards, given an individually tailored quality improvement plan and supported through training and mentoring visits. We find zero to small effects on management scores, suggesting that improving management practices in this setting may be challenging.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Powell-Jackson & Jessica J C King & Christina Makungu & Matthew Quaife & Catherine Goodman, 2023. "Management Practices and Quality of Care: Evidence from the Private Health Care Sector in Tanzania," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 134(657), pages 436-456.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:134:y:2023:i:657:p:436-456.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/uead075
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:134:y:2023:i:657:p:436-456.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.