IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/econjl/v133y2023i649p493-515..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Populist Persuasion in Electoral Campaigns: Evidence from Bryan's Unique Whistle-Stop Tour

Author

Listed:
  • Johannes C Buggle
  • Stephanos Vlachos

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of campaign appearances in the context of the one-sided nationwide tour by William J. Bryan, the Democratic US presidential candidate in 1896. During this electoral campaign, Bryan undertook an unprecedented whistle-stop train tour, while the Republican candidate followed a front-porch campaign. To identify the causal effect of campaign speeches, we exploit several estimation strategies, including a within-county difference-in-differences design and a neighbour-pair fixed effect estimator. We find that campaign visits by Bryan increased his vote share by about one percentage point on average. This increase likely stems from the persuasion of previously non-aligned industrial workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Johannes C Buggle & Stephanos Vlachos, 2023. "Populist Persuasion in Electoral Campaigns: Evidence from Bryan's Unique Whistle-Stop Tour," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 133(649), pages 493-515.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:133:y:2023:i:649:p:493-515.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ej/ueac056
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:econjl:v:133:y:2023:i:649:p:493-515.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.