This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

The Effects of Market Practices in Oligopolistic Markets: An Experimental Examination of the Ethyl Case

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Grether, David M
Plott, Charles R
Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Oxford University Press in its journal Economic Inquiry.

Volume (Year): 22 (1984)
Issue (Month): 4 (October)
Pages: 479-507
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:oup:ecinqu:v:22:y:1984:i:4:p:479-507

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, UK
Fax: 01865 267 985
Email:
Web page: http://ei.oupjournals.org/

Order Information:
Web: http://www.oup.co.uk/journals

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Katerina Sherstyuk, 1999. "Collusion Without Conspiracy: An Experimental Study of One-Sided Auctions," Experimental Economics, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 59-75, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  2. José Apesteguia & Martin Dufwenberg & Reinhard Selten, 2003. "Blowing the Whistle," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers bgse9_2003, University of Bonn, Germany. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Cason, Timothy N. & Plott, Charles R., 2004. "Forced information disclosure and the fallacy of transparency in markets," Working Papers 1202, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Guth, W. & Kroger, S. & Maug, E., 2003. "You may have to do it again, Rocky! - An expirimental analysis of bargaining with risky joint profits -," Discussion Paper 117, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  5. S.L. Schreft & A.P. Villamil, 1990. "Liquidity constraints in commercial loan markets with imperfect information and imperfect competition," Working Paper 90-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. [Downloadable!]
  6. Kirchsteiger, G. & Niederle, M. & Potters, J., 2001. "Public versus private exchanges," Discussion Paper 101, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
  7. Brit Grosskopf & Alvin E. Roth, 2006. "If you are offered the Right of First Refusal, Should you accept? An Investigation of Contract Design," Levine's Bibliography 122247000000001017, UCLA Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  8. Claude, DÕASPREMONT & Rodolphe, DOS SANTOS FERREIRA, 2005. "Oligopolistic Competition as a Common Agency Game," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2005018, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  9. Kirchsteiger, G. & Niederle, M. & Potters, J., 1998. "The endogenous evolution of market institutions an experimental investigation," Discussion Paper 67, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research. [Downloadable!]
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Apart from a small start up grant in the 1990's, RePEc has received no funding and lives on the help of volunteers.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-19.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.