IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v63y2023i1p59-77..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban housing affordability, economic disadvantage and racial disparities in gun violence: A neighbourhood analysis in four US cities

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Stansfield
  • Daniel Semenza

Abstract

This study seeks to examine how urban affordability, and related issues of eviction and joblessness, are associated with gun violence in the United States. After discussing the theoretical importance of studying housing affordability, we provide a preliminary examination of how urban affordability moderates the relationship between other markers of economic disadvantage and gun violence. This study further considers whether these different indicators of disadvantage are associated with gun violence differently by majority Black and majority White neighbourhoods. This study rests on neighbourhood-level data from 4 large US cities. Through a series of fixed-effects models, our results reveal that changes in affordability are significantly associated with rising gun violence in general, particularly in majority Black neighbourhoods. Furthermore, joblessness and eviction are less influential in shaping gun violence in more affordable neighbourhoods, but more consequential in communities facing higher rent burdens. The study reiterates several recommendations about reducing unaffordability in urban communities, as well as recommending several avenues for future research on urban violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Stansfield & Daniel Semenza, 2023. "Urban housing affordability, economic disadvantage and racial disparities in gun violence: A neighbourhood analysis in four US cities," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 63(1), pages 59-77.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:63:y:2023:i:1:p:59-77.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab119
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:63:y:2023:i:1:p:59-77.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.