IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v62y2022i5p1233-1251..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Race and Men’s Imprisonment in the United States: Religious Conservatism, Political Conservatism and Racial Threat

Author

Listed:
  • Philip J Levchak
  • Karen Heimer
  • Joseph B Lang
  • Janet L Lauritsen

Abstract

Black men are overrepresented in United States prisons and the number of Black men incarcerated increased dramatically during America’s “prison boom.” Yet, existing research on male imprisonment rates in the United States has focused on explaining overall rates and has not statistically modeled rates disaggregated by race over time. This study uses seemingly unrelated regression techniques to analyze annual rates of Black and non-Black men incarcerated in state prisons during the period of greatest increase in United States imprisonment rates. The findings show that increasing evangelical religious conservativism is associated with higher Black imprisonment rates and, importantly, this effect is “amplified” when state legislatures are more politically conservative. We also find that as Black populations increase, the punitive effect of religious conservatism is moderated or attenuated, and this holds for the incarceration of Black as well as non-Black men. In addition, consistent with a racial threat perspective, growth in Black populations in states is linked with increases in Black as well as non-Black male imprisonment rates. Together these effects emphasize the importance of examining imprisonment rates disaggregated by race and highlight the joint and conditional effects of religious conservatism, political conservatism, and racial threat for understanding imprisonment in the United States.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip J Levchak & Karen Heimer & Joseph B Lang & Janet L Lauritsen, 2022. "Race and Men’s Imprisonment in the United States: Religious Conservatism, Political Conservatism and Racial Threat," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(5), pages 1233-1251.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:5:p:1233-1251.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azac049
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:5:p:1233-1251.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.