IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v62y2022i4p931-947..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Old, New, Borrowed and Blue – Shifts In Modern Policing

Author

Listed:
  • Johanne Yttri Dahl
  • Nicholas R Fyfe
  • Helene Oppen Ingebrigtsen Gundhus
  • Paul Larsson
  • Pernille Erichsen Skjevrak
  • Siv Rebekka Runhovde
  • Annette Vestby

Abstract

This article analyses ambiguity and complexity in proactive policing practices and identifies the paradox that despite the focus on increasing proactivity, police work remains strongly reactive. Drawing on a set of Norwegian case studies of policing in different domains, the article shows how under an overarching objective of ‘combating crime’, the distinctions between non-coercive (mainly proactive) forms of prevention or (mainly reactive) methods such as investigation or intelligence are seen as unimportant. This creates a demand for professionals working across different crime types, leading to a shift towards high policing in everyday life and tension between experts and generalists. Other, unintended consequences include a fragmentation of tasks and a more general and abstract way of policing. The result is pluralization and multiagency partnership strategies, where the police conduct high-policing tasks and external actors conduct low-policing tasks. These findings point to the emergence of new forms of hybrid of policing.

Suggested Citation

  • Johanne Yttri Dahl & Nicholas R Fyfe & Helene Oppen Ingebrigtsen Gundhus & Paul Larsson & Pernille Erichsen Skjevrak & Siv Rebekka Runhovde & Annette Vestby, 2022. "Old, New, Borrowed and Blue – Shifts In Modern Policing," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(4), pages 931-947.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:4:p:931-947.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab085
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:4:p:931-947.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.