IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v62y2022i4p822-839..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

This is how it Feels: Activating Lived Experience in the Penal Voluntary Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Gillian Buck
  • Philippa Tomczak
  • Kaitlyn Quinn

Abstract

Increasing calls for ‘nothing about us without us’ envision marginalized people as valuable and necessary contributors to policies and practices affecting them. In this paper, we examine what this type of inclusion feels like for criminalized people who share their lived experiences in penal voluntary sector organizations. Focus groups conducted in England and Scotland illustrated how this work was experienced as both safe, inclusionary and rewarding and exclusionary, shame-provoking and precarious. We highlight how these tensions of ‘user involvement’ impact criminalized individuals and compound wider inequalities within this sector. The individual, emotional and structural implications of activating lived experience, therefore, require careful consideration. We consider how the penal voluntary sector might more meaningfully and supportively engage criminalized individuals in service design and delivery. These considerations are significant for broader criminal justice and social service provision seeking to meaningfully involve those with lived experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Gillian Buck & Philippa Tomczak & Kaitlyn Quinn, 2022. "This is how it Feels: Activating Lived Experience in the Penal Voluntary Sector," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(4), pages 822-839.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:4:p:822-839.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab102
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:4:p:822-839.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.