IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v62y2022i3p716-733..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policing’s New Vulnerability Re-Envisioning Local Accountability in an Era of Global Outrage

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Goldsmith
  • Eugene McLaughlin

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that globally networked activism such as that triggered by the murder of George Floyd has dramatically amplified, and consequently rendered processes of police reform and accountability more vulnerable to exogenous influences. Recently witnessed activism in this sphere derives much of its significance from the ability to leverage the latest audio-visual technologies and social media platforms. The Black Lives Matter protests demonstrate how these technologies and platforms make flashpoint images of violent policing visible to diverse, global audiences in an extraordinary manner. Using the examples of Australia and the United Kingdom, we argue that these viral images have the capacity to ‘collapse contexts’ and radically disrupt policing in the places to which they migrate. The complicated impact of migrating flashpoint images of violent policing from ‘over there’ to ‘over here’ necessitates urgent analysis and debate.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Goldsmith & Eugene McLaughlin, 2022. "Policing’s New Vulnerability Re-Envisioning Local Accountability in an Era of Global Outrage," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(3), pages 716-733.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:3:p:716-733.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab073
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:3:p:716-733.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.