IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/crimin/v62y2022i1p106-123..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dirty Work? Policing Online Indecency in Digital Forensics

Author

Listed:
  • Dana Wilson-Kovacs
  • Brian Rappert
  • Lauren Redfern

Abstract

More than 80 per cent of the work undertaken by digital forensics examiners deals with images of sexual abuse of children. While a growing body of literature analyses the emotional dimensions of coping with such material and the need to minimize exposure to it, less attention has been given to the day-to-day organizational arrangements in which such images are processed. Using ethnographic observations and interviews with practitioners, police officers and senior managers in four constabularies in England, this article examines the tension-ridden place for managing extensive contact with indecent images of children and argues that despite handling of transgressive material, digital forensic examiners distance themselves from imputations of being ‘dirty’ workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana Wilson-Kovacs & Brian Rappert & Lauren Redfern, 2022. "Dirty Work? Policing Online Indecency in Digital Forensics," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 62(1), pages 106-123.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:1:p:106-123.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/bjc/azab055
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:crimin:v:62:y:2022:i:1:p:106-123.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/bjc .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.