IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/copoec/v41y2022i1p153-167..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Linear Wage-Profit Equations Support Neoclassical Theory?
[The theory of value and distribution and the problem of capital]

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Nell

Abstract

Empirical investigations have found relatively few cases of reswitching or capital reversal, but many more instances than expected of what look like Neo-Classical relationships, leading some eagerly to Affirm the Consequent, and call for restoration of the good old stories. This is unwarranted. A necessarily brief and incomplete account of recent work in the theory of money and credit shows that these seemingly neoclassical relationships may have a completely different origin and meaning. They are part of the structure and institutions, including markets, that support the circulation of money and credit, and the neoclassical appearance in particulars arises from the relation between r and g, properly adjusted. It has little or nothing to do with the flawed ‘Choice of Technique’ or with the stories of ‘substitution’ between labour and capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Nell, 2022. "Do Linear Wage-Profit Equations Support Neoclassical Theory? [The theory of value and distribution and the problem of capital]," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 41(1), pages 153-167.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:41:y:2022:i:1:p:153-167.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cpe/bzac009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:41:y:2022:i:1:p:153-167.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.