IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/copoec/v36y2017i1p81-102..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quesnay And The Analysis Of Surplus In The Capitalist Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Franklin Serrano
  • Numa Mazat

Abstract

In order to discuss the ‘rational foundation’ of certain aspects of Quesnay's theory we use a simple formalization of the necessary connections between assumptions about the techniques in use, the distribution of income between the classes and sectors and the system of relative prices. We argue that in Quesnay's system agriculture was truly capitalist and that he was indeed a pioneer of the classical political economy/surplus approach to economics as identified first by Karl Marx, Piero Sraffa and Pierangelo Garegnani, the physical surplus of grains being the necessary basis for his analysis of the distribution and relative prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Franklin Serrano & Numa Mazat, 2017. "Quesnay And The Analysis Of Surplus In The Capitalist Agriculture," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 36(1), pages 81-102.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:36:y:2017:i:1:p:81-102.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cpe/bzx004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • B11 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Preclassical (Ancient, Medieval, Mercantilist, Physiocratic)
    • B12 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought through 1925 - - - Classical (includes Adam Smith)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:36:y:2017:i:1:p:81-102.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.