IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/copoec/v28y2009i1p71-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marx's Theory of Ground Rent: A Critical Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel D. Ramirez

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel D. Ramirez, 2009. "Marx's Theory of Ground Rent: A Critical Assessment," Contributions to Political Economy, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 28(1), pages 71-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:28:y:2009:i:1:p:71-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cpe/bzp001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Callum Ward & Manuel B Aalbers, 2016. "Virtual special issue editorial essay: ‘The shitty rent business’: What’s the point of land rent theory?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1760-1783, July.
    2. Saverio M. Fratini, 2018. "Is Marx's absolute rent due to a monopoly price?," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 961-985, September.
    3. Miguel D. Ramirez, 2020. "Capital as a social process: A Marxian perspective," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 9(1), pages 41-71.
    4. Miguel D. Ramirez, 2021. "Ricardo's and Marx's Conception of Absolute and Relative Value: A Critical Overview," Working Papers 2101, Trinity College, Department of Economics.
    5. Miguel D. Ramirez, 2020. "Marx's Theory of Value: A Sympathetic Yet Critical Perspective," Working Papers 2001, Trinity College, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2020.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:copoec:v:28:y:2009:i:1:p:71-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.