IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v6y2012i1p3-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Creatives after the crash

Author

Listed:
  • Betsy Donald
  • Meric S. Gertler
  • Peter Tyler

Abstract

We examine recent evidence concerning the fate of creative workers since the economic crash of 2007–2008. There is some consensus that the creative economy is an important economic driver and does represent a source of fundamental economic change. There is less agreement on what this change means for the creative worker and workforce. Some studies suggest that the creative workforce has weathered the storm much better than those in lower-order service and manufacturing occupations. Others challenge this finding and some studies point to the growing precariousness and vulnerability of creative work. What does seem clear is that the nature and degree of vulnerability is shaped and influenced by the wider macro-institutional architectures within which this economic activity is situated. Copyright 2012, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Betsy Donald & Meric S. Gertler & Peter Tyler, 2012. "Creatives after the crash," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 6(1), pages 3-21.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:3-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rss023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:6:y:2012:i:1:p:3-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.