IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cjrecs/v12y2019i1p57-75..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Iron Silk Roads: the geopolitics of past and present initiatives for the revival of Eurasian trade through overland transport corridors

Author

Listed:
  • Irene (E) Anastasiadou

Abstract

This article aims to historically contextualise the recent initiative of the Chinese government to promote its OBOR policy by discussing a number of similar initiatives for the establishment of overland transport corridors between Europe and Asia, pursued by a number of actors globally since the end of WW2. The PRC got involved in such projects initially in 1979, and this intensified in 1990s. The history of such projects reveals how regional and non-regional actors have promoted a variety of visions for the configuration of Europe-Asia overland freight transport corridors in two historical periods: the years of the Cold War, and the years of the post-Cold War. I argue that, here, such projects aimed at connecting countries and continents while also excluding others, and to show how various global actors have historically seen—and still do so today—the establishment of such corridors through a technocratic lens, namely not only to promote intercultural exchanges, but to consolidate political and economic alliances across countries and continents by bridging the peoples of different nation-states but also civilisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Irene (E) Anastasiadou, 2019. "Iron Silk Roads: the geopolitics of past and present initiatives for the revival of Eurasian trade through overland transport corridors," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 12(1), pages 57-75.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:57-75.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cjres/rsy035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Damoah, Kaku Attah & Giovannetti, Giorgia & Marvasi, Enrico, 2022. "Do country centrality and similarity to China matter in the allocation of belt and road projects?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 660-674.
    2. Kaku Attah Damoah & Giorgia Giovannetti & Enrico Marvasi, 2023. "Five Stylized Facts on Belt and Road Countries and Their Trade Patterns," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(1), pages 149-181, January.
    3. Marcin Gornikiewicz & Jaroslaw Zelkowski, 2020. "Belt and Road Initiative in the Age of COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for the Development of the Strategic Project of the People’s Republic of China," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 3), pages 302-310.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cjrecs:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:57-75.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cjres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.