IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v47y2023i3p507-534..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping modern economic rents: the good, the bad, and the grey areas

Author

Listed:
  • Mariana Mazzucato
  • Josh Ryan-Collins
  • Giorgos Gouzoulis

Abstract

There is increasing consensus that modern capitalist economies suffer from excessive rent extraction in both financial and real economy sectors. However, scholars have yet to develop a coherent analytical framework for identifying the common characteristics of modern economic rents. In particular, there has been little attention paid to distinguishing ‘good’ rents—key to innovation and growth—from ‘bad’ forms which contribute to economic stagnation and inequalities of wealth and income. This paper takes some first steps in this direction. We first review the existing rent theory most pertinent to this distinction, including classical political economy, the early twentieth century institutionalists, neoclassical perspectives and Keynes’s analysis of financial rentiers. Secondly, we map and conceptualise some key stylised features of modern rents, drawing on descriptive empirical evidence. We then identify the key questions that these developments raise for rent theory, elaborating a new research and policy agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariana Mazzucato & Josh Ryan-Collins & Giorgos Gouzoulis, 2023. "Mapping modern economic rents: the good, the bad, and the grey areas," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 47(3), pages 507-534.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:47:y:2023:i:3:p:507-534.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bead013
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:47:y:2023:i:3:p:507-534.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.