IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v46y2022i2p371-390..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demand-led growth decomposition: an empirical investigation of the Brazilian slowdown in the 2010s

Author

Listed:
  • Guilherme R Magacho
  • Igor L Rocha

Abstract

The empirical investigation on countries' long-term growth usually relies on growth accounting methods, which are based on a supply-led approach, where factors accumulation are the main countries' growth constraints. This approach, however, ignores the importance of effective demand in explaining the long-term dynamics. Conversely, Keynesians stress the centrality of effective demand to explain why some countries present high growth rates for prolonged periods and others do not. They account for different views on the determinants of demand growth, such as exports dynamics, income distribution and public investment. The aim of the paper is twofold. Firstly, it extends the SDA method – a method that allows us to identify sources of changes in input–output matrices – to account for endogenous consumption and import-substitution impacts, and, secondly, it applies this method to understand the Brazilian slowdown in the 2010s. Based on a Miyazawa–Leontief framework, it is possible to identify the importance of each of the demand factors in explaining countries' growth, considering both the autonomous sources of demand and their potential to spread through the economy via their multiplier effects. The application of this extension to investigate the Brazilian slowdown in the 2010s shows the importance of natural resource exports, public investment and absorption of domestic demand in different sub-periods. Based on these findings, we discuss the possibility of Brazil to restore its growth potential through specific demand stimulus, such as infrastructure investments.

Suggested Citation

  • Guilherme R Magacho & Igor L Rocha, 2022. "Demand-led growth decomposition: an empirical investigation of the Brazilian slowdown in the 2010s," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(2), pages 371-390.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:46:y:2022:i:2:p:371-390.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beac001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:46:y:2022:i:2:p:371-390.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.