IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v45y2021i5p1027-1046..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Knightian to Keynesian uncertainty: contextualising Ellsberg’s ambiguity

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo Zappia

Abstract

This paper argues that Daniel Ellsberg regarded the urn examples and conception of ambiguity presented in his famous 1961 paper as merely a step towards the analysis of more fundamental forms of uncertainty. Drawing on what is known about Ellsberg’s activities during the 1950s and early 1960s, it is shown that, after starting his project as one of reviving Frank Knight’s ideas about uncertainty, Ellsberg went on to realise that his position was in fact rather closer to that of John Maynard Keynes in his A Treatise on Probability. Furthermore, it is shown that formerly classified research Ellsberg undertook in the early 1960s also reveals an abiding influence in fundamental uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo Zappia, 2021. "From Knightian to Keynesian uncertainty: contextualising Ellsberg’s ambiguity," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 45(5), pages 1027-1046.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:45:y:2021:i:5:p:1027-1046.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beab024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carlo Zappia, 2021. "Keynes's Treatise on Probability at 100 Years: Its Most Enduring Message," GREDEG Working Papers 2021-36, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:45:y:2021:i:5:p:1027-1046.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.