IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v45y2021i3p559-575..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some additions and corrections for Sraffa on Ricardo in Business

Author

Listed:
  • Wilfried Parys

Abstract

Sraffa’s Ricardo edition gained a well-deserved authoritative status and numerous authors have studied its first nine volumes. I concentrate on ‘Ricardo in Business’ in Volume 10, and I present some additions and corrections, with respect to, for example, Ricardo’s activities at the Stock Exchange, the 1811 incident about Wetenhall’s price lists and the 1814 Berenger fraud, the huge British Loan contracts of the Barnes-Steers-Ricardo consortium and the identity of its unknown fourth member, the timing and the effects of the news from the Battle of Waterloo, the financial hierarchy in the two (not four) consortia that contracted for the Waterloo Loan and earlier Loans. Silberling (1924) accused Ricardo of dishonest strategies against Goldsmid’s consortium. Sraffa destroyed Silberling’s arguments in 1955, 24 years after informing Cannan about his ‘ammunition’. Using newly discovered letters from Barnes, I suggest that Silberling even confused victims and perpetrators. I also examine the quality of quotations by Sraffa, Dobb and a few others.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilfried Parys, 2021. "Some additions and corrections for Sraffa on Ricardo in Business," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 45(3), pages 559-575.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:45:y:2021:i:3:p:559-575.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beab003
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:45:y:2021:i:3:p:559-575.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.