IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v44y2020i3p491-505..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisiting the concept of liquidity in liquidity preference

Author

Listed:
  • James Culham

Abstract

This paper revisits Keynes’s theory of liquidity preference to emphasise its reliance on liquidity. By clarifying the meaning of ‘liquidity’ in the context of the theory, it is argued that liquidity preference is not based on the demand for money, the most tradable asset, or a theory of bearishness. Instead, liquidity preference represents a demand for price-protected (capital-safe) assets, most directly inside and outside money, but also cash-equivalent quasi-money such as self-liquidating assets and security repurchase agreements (repo). The theory of liquidity preference explains that the public is willing to forgo interest income to hold short-term price-protected assets due to the capital and price uncertainty associated with relying on market liquidity, or how easy it is to convert an asset into money. It follows that the rate of interest is a monetary phenomenon and is determined independently of saving and investment.

Suggested Citation

  • James Culham, 2020. "Revisiting the concept of liquidity in liquidity preference," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 44(3), pages 491-505.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:44:y:2020:i:3:p:491-505.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bez057
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nina Eichacker, 2022. "Institutional constraints, liquidity provision, and endogenous money in the Eurozone core and periphery before and after crises: A preliminary comparison of the Eurozone Crisis and the Coronavirus Pan," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 75(303), pages 403-424.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:44:y:2020:i:3:p:491-505.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.