IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v42y2018i4p901-916..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Northern Ireland’s property market crisis: insights from Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis
[Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling]

Author

Listed:
  • Emer Marie Gallagher
  • Elaine Ramsey
  • Derek Bond

Abstract

The financial crisis of 2007 has shown that standard mainstream macroeconomic models underpinned by general equilibrium theory fail to anticipate, explain and provide guidance on how to respond to such events (Stiglitz, 2011). Evidence in the Northern Ireland context has further suggested that applying these models to property markets may be inappropriate given the underlying statistical properties of these time series (Gallagher et al., 2015). These issues combined suggest that there may be merit in examining cases of financial crises through alternative theoretical frameworks and in adopting a more pluralist approach. With this in mind, this paper investigates whether Minsky’s (1975, 1986, 1992) Financial Instability Hypothesis can assist in understanding the recent property market crisis in Northern Ireland, which was severe by both national and international standards. Using qualitative evidence to analyse the behaviours of borrowers represented by property developers and lenders represented by banks over the course of the business cycle, this paper assesses the relevance of Minsky’s arguments. The findings show that Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis explains the incidents observed in Northern Ireland’s property market in recent years.

Suggested Citation

  • Emer Marie Gallagher & Elaine Ramsey & Derek Bond, 2018. "Northern Ireland’s property market crisis: insights from Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis [Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(4), pages 901-916.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:42:y:2018:i:4:p:901-916.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bey002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:42:y:2018:i:4:p:901-916.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.