IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v42y2018i1p1-17..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic problem of a community: ontological reflections inspired by the Socialist Calculation Debate
[Il ministro della produzione nello stato collettivista, Giornale degli economisti, 37 (Anno 19)]

Author

Listed:
  • Diogo Lourenço
  • Mário Graça Moura

Abstract

Implicitly, the Socialist Calculation Debate is about the connection between neoclassical theory and reality. It involves several ontological presuppositions, with wide-ranging implications. Our purpose is to discuss one of these presuppositions. We want to scrutinise the conception, implicit in the ‘market socialist’ arguments, that things have economic roles or functions independently of the social environment in which they exist. Primary factors and techniques of production are taken to exist independently of social arrangements; jointly with consumer preferences, they are supposed to define the economic problem of a community. In criticising this conception, we borrow from F. A. Hayek, complementing his reflections with those of Donald Davidson, Tony Lawson and others. We also discuss a second problem, which follows directly from the first: if, in contrast with the market socialists’ conception, the economic roles of things depend holistically on complex social processes, how can we compare alternative forms of economic organisation?

Suggested Citation

  • Diogo Lourenço & Mário Graça Moura, 2018. "The economic problem of a community: ontological reflections inspired by the Socialist Calculation Debate [Il ministro della produzione nello stato collettivista, Giornale degli economisti, 37 (Ann," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 42(1), pages 1-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:42:y:2018:i:1:p:1-17.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bex041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:42:y:2018:i:1:p:1-17.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.