IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v40y2016i4p1019-1035..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surplus-producing labour as a capability: a Marxian contribution to Amartya Sen’s revival of classical political economy

Author

Listed:
  • Faruk Eray Düzenli

Abstract

Labour is construed as an income-generating capacity or as creative activity in the capabilities approach. This rendition misses a vital capability that Marx articulates: labour as a potential to produce surplus. Accordingly, following Marx, I define labour as the ability, freedom and willingness to produce more than what labourers deem necessary to sustain themselves. I argue each has this capability and should willingly realise it in accordance with their ability. With this definition, additional questions arise as to who should appropriate the surplus or receive a portion of it. I contend that each, irrespective of their role in production, should have the capability to appropriate surplus, just as each should have the capability to claim and receive a portion of the surplus according to their needs. I finish by showing the prevalent normative framework of the capitalist economy, ‘equal rights and equal exchange’, is nothing other than exclusive rights (capabilities) and unequal exchange, which results in exploitation, now defined as a violation of capabilities equality. By contrast, I call for a non-exclusive, ‘radical equality’ à la Sen: no one is excluded from participating in or having access to any moment of this surplus economy, one that is non-exploitative and communal, as each capability is extended to each individual.

Suggested Citation

  • Faruk Eray Düzenli, 2016. "Surplus-producing labour as a capability: a Marxian contribution to Amartya Sen’s revival of classical political economy," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 40(4), pages 1019-1035.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:40:y:2016:i:4:p:1019-1035.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/bev041
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:40:y:2016:i:4:p:1019-1035.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.