IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v39y2015i3p825-842..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The new Keynesian view of aggregate demand: some reflections from a classical-Sraffian standpoint

Author

Listed:
  • Graham White

Abstract

The paper argues that the derivation of the aggregate demand curve in the new Keynesian literature is insufficient to provide the theoretical ground for the use to which it is usually put; namely, as a theoretical basis for the claim that long-run wage and price flexibility would push a capitalist economy to the full-employment or ‘natural’ level of output. It is argued that the derivation solely on the basis of the propositions about optimising household consumption expenditures is insufficient to guarantee a decreasing aggregate demand function without circular reasoning. This point is clarified by use of a very simple two-commodity production model of long-run steady states due to Spaventa and Nell. To guarantee a decreasing aggregate demand function, the new Keynesian approach must invoke the kinds of propositions used in more traditional derivations, propositions which themselves are in question on capital-theoretic grounds.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham White, 2015. "The new Keynesian view of aggregate demand: some reflections from a classical-Sraffian standpoint," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 39(3), pages 825-842.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:39:y:2015:i:3:p:825-842.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beu009
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:39:y:2015:i:3:p:825-842.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.