IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/cambje/v39y2015i3p807-824..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Early classics and Quesnay after Sraffa: a suggested interpretation

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Cartelier

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to show how useful Sraffa’s formal scheme is for a critical study of classical economists in general and Quesnay’s Tableau économique in particular. Sraffa’s parsimonious argumentation offers a strong incentive to generalise his framework and suggest the idea of a classical system of prices whose prices of production would be a special case. To elaborate a clear notion of a classical system of prices relevant for the study of a priori different authors is the first objective of this article. In this view, the basic elements of a classical system of prices are distinguished: technique of production, rule of imputation of the price of surplus and conditions of reproduction. Even if this may help to have a fresh look on some authors like Petty or Cantillon, it is certainly (with the obvious exception of Ricardo and Torrens) about Quesnay and his Tableau économique that the idea of a classical system of prices is the most fruitful. To suggest a renewed reading of the Tableau is the second objective of the present article.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Cartelier, 2015. "Early classics and Quesnay after Sraffa: a suggested interpretation," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 39(3), pages 807-824.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:39:y:2015:i:3:p:807-824.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/cje/beu034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:cambje:v:39:y:2015:i:3:p:807-824.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/cje .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.